Page 77 - 2018台玻csr英文1022

Suppliers / Sub-contractors Qualified Job Evaluation Details
Evaluation and Audit Price Evaluation Schedule

Each quarter, Taiwan Glass uses 1-PO-B05-08 ¾ Annual evaluations are conducted at the end of every December and are completed by the Leadership CH.1 Sustainable Glass
(supplier evaluation form) to evaluate the prices, 20th of the following month.
supplier
punctualities, and qualities of suppliers that might ¾ Quarterly evaluations are conducted every March, June, September and December and
evaluations Delivery
affect our product quality. The result serves as a completed before the 15th of the following months.
Product punctualitie sities
reference for future procurements. Quality Quality assurance units (and the units that actually use the materials) are responsible for
For supplier evaluations, our procurement units evaluating quality items; units that submit purchase requisitions or the material units are CH.2 Ethical
evaluate the suppliers' prices; material units evaluate responsible for evaluating the delivery; procurement units are responsible for evaluating prices Operation
the suppliers' punctuality and the quality assurance In 2018, the overall performance of and calculating the total numbers in the surveys.
suppliers was good, with about 97%
units evaluate the suppliers' product quality. The of A-level and 3% of B-level.
evaluation results are recorded for reference for future Supply Chain CSR Management
procurements.
In addition to the management of existing suppliers, TGI also extends the concept of sustainable
Our procurement staff uses the evaluation results We categorize our suppliers as A, B and C classes. development to the supply chain. We introduced the "Supply Chain CSR Management Evaluation" in 2015, CH.3 Quality
above to calculate and produce run charts every assessing the environmental impact, labor conditions, human rights, social impact and product liabilities of
quarter. They analyze and compare the data every Continue Ú 90 points part of the new suppliers and current suppliers. The evaluation aims to encourage our suppliers to improve Management
6 months and conduct in-depth analysis once a ŭ cooperation their methods and fulfill their corporate social responsibility voluntarily.
problematic trend is discovered in order to solve the
problems or confirm the feasibility or effectiveness of CSR Evaluation Analysis
our procurement system. TGI evaluates its suppliers Ů Acceptable 70 - 89 points
each quarter to make sure that our suppliers meet our TGI evaluated the suppliers' corporate social responsibility, analyzed the overall scores from all aspects,
requirements and maintain a long-term and quality and implemented questionnaires in the form of information disclosure as a basis for the evaluation of our
cooperation with quality suppliers. In 2018, there is no ů Teerminate Ù 69points suppliers' CSR results. Questionnaires were collected from 16 suppliers. The results indicated 69% of the Protection CH.4 Environmental
C-class manufacturer, which meets TGI'srequirements. suppliers as excellent, qualified suppliers were about 31% and 0% of the suppliers needed to improve.
Manufacturers are required to provide high-quality
material only and do so punctually. From the results, the control of the environment and human rights-oriented should be stressed further.
In the future, TGI will review the score and analysis methods and continue tracking the progress of
improvement. The analysis results are as follows:
2018 TGI Suppliers Assessment CH.5 Friendly
Aspect scores for information
Number of Suppliers Evaluated Every Quarter Supplier Assessment Aspect ratios of suppliers (%) Workplace
disclosure of suppliers
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Opportunity Total
Aspect Score for Improvement Score
Level A 160 161 148 152 Level A 96% 99% 96% 96.8% (%) (%) (%) Environment (EN) CH.6

Environment (EN) 78.47 21.53 100
Level B 6 2 6 5 Level B 4% 1% 4% 3.2% Labour (LA) Care
Labour (LA) 87.20 12.80 100 Community
Level C 0 0 0 0 Level C 0% 0% 0% 0.0% Human Rights (HR)
Human Rights 90.10 9.90 100
(HR) Social aspect (SO)
Total 166 163 154 157
Social aspect 95.83 4.17 100 Product (PR)
(SO)
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Product (PR) 92.08 7.92 100 Score Opportunity for improvement

074 // 2018 TAIWAN GLASS IND. CORP. Corporate Social Responsibility Report // // 2018 TAIWAN GLASS IND. CORP. Corporate Social Responsibility Report // 075