Page 58 - 2016 TGI CSR 電子書

Supply Chain CSR Management

In addition to fulfilling our own corporate social responsibility, Taiwan Glass also extends the
concept of sustainability to our supply chain. TGI realized, in 2014, that traditional evaluations are no
longer sufficient for the suppliers. Sustainability management should also be included in evaluations

in order to manage supply chain’s risk and enhance their values. Therefore Taiwan Glass introduced
the "Supply Chain CSR Management Evaluation" in 2015, assessing the environmental impact, labor
conditions, human rights, social impact and product liabilities of part of the new suppliers and current
suppliers. The evaluation aims to encourage our suppliers to improve their methods and fulfill their
corporate social responsibility voluntarily.

CSR Evaluation Analysis:

TGI evaluated the corporate social responsibilities of its subsidiaries and suppliers and
analyzed the scores from all aspects. The evaluation was conducted by using information disclosure
questionnaires, which became the foundation of our suppliers’CSR evaluation results. Questionnaires
were collected from four subsidiaries and 16 suppliers and the results of the subsidiaries were all

excellent. However, generally speaking, scores for labor-oriented questions were low, mainly due to
work injury incidents at a subsidiary company during the survey period; results indicated 68.75% of
the suppliers as excellent and qualified suppliers were about 31.25%. There were no suppliers who
needed improvement (0%). Overall results for each aspect showed that the environmental control
should be stressed further. Whether this was labor issues of subsidiaries or environmental issues of
suppliers, perhaps in the future TGI will review the score and analysis methods and continue tracking
the progress of improvement. 2 of 16 suppliers have issued CSR related reports. The following is the

results of the analysis：

Subsidiaries

Analysis of subsidiary evaluation
Score analysis for the 4 subsidiaries
result

Number of
Classification Score Percentage
subsidiaries
Gold (good) 105~85 4 100%

Silver
84~60 0 0%
(qualified)

Bronze
(to be <60 0 0%
improved)
total 4 100%

56